Nelson is concerned, however, that people are going to expect the same kind of impressive stunts he's delivered at Matt's and in Venice. I ask if this is a problem - aren't his works just a bit too much fun for the viewer? This doesn't worry him: "I like the work to be accessible, and I think it's important to make work that's visually and aesthetically pleasing. And hopefully people's experience of the work will have many layers - so they'll think back in a few months' time and different aspects of the piece will come together." Hopefully he's right, but unpicking the tangled net of references that underpin each installation can be hard work. Without Nelson's verbal crib sheet you'd need several years and a PhD in Eastern European literature to work out all the links: Russian sci-fi, pulp fiction, Tarkovsky, Burroughs, the Strugatsky Brothers, Lem, Borges, B-movies, Eighties anarchist tracts - you name it, the breadth of his reference is mesmerising.