Top Boy star Micheal Ward found not guilty of rape after London trial

Actor Micheal Ward has been found not guilty of two counts of rape following a trial at Snaresbrook Crown Court.

The Bafta winning star, who has appeared in Top Boy and Empire of Light, was also fount not guilty of two counts of assault by penetration and one count of sexual assault.

Mr Ward, 28, had been accused of attacking a woman in a Mercedes in January 2023 outside a New Year party.

The star denied assaulting the woman, saying their encounter had been consensual and they were “having a great time”.

The woman had told the court that she felt “numb” and “scared”, remembered “wanting it all to be over” and that “I didn’t really feel like I had a choice”.

The jury took five hours and 25 minutes to reach their verdicts, before unanimously finding the actor not guilty of all charges on Friday.

Mr Ward stood quietly in the dock and held his hand to his mouth as the jury foreman slowly announced the verdicts, while some in the public gallery, which had been packed with family and friends during each day of the trial, held back tears.

Mr Ward then burst in to tears and leaned heavily on his defence lawyer as she helped him out of the room.

The court had earlier heard that Mr Ward came from humble beginnings in London’s east end, before finding fame with a breakout role in the critically acclaimed Top Boy drama series. He won the Bafta rising star honour in 2020.

Mr Ward met his accuser who was with her friends outside the party in Gants Hill, east London.

He told the court that he and the woman flirted, had foreplay, enjoyed “passionate” kisses, and that an intimate act between them would not have happened if she did not want it.

She was confident and “very cute” he said, adding: “We had a mutual attraction with each other. We engaged in consensual sex, had a great time and she was actively participating in what we were doing all the time.”

Ward recalled having a “quite flirty” conversation with the woman who accepted she was flattered when he asked for her Snapchat details.

Ward told the jury: “I could tell there was interest there – from her eye contact and the way she was speaking.”

He thought he saw her “once or twice” at the party and got a “great vibe from her” via the “nice” and “flirty” chat they had.

As the party ended he unexpectedly got a message from her saying she was waiting by a car.

The court heard the pair kissed and hugged in a Mercedes outside the party, and later had an intimate encounter in another Mercedes outside an after party event.

He asked her to go into the back seat which she did.

The car door was unlocked, she gave no indication she wanted to leave as they kissed again and became involved in a “developing situation,” Mr Ward said.

He also told the court: “I really feel that she wanted to be there. She never mentioned anything about wanting to leave.”

He said he did not force her, and they kissed, hugged, had a conversation before she left.

Before the woman went to the party she Googled Ward and sent those pictures to her friend, the court heard.

Prosecutor Tracy Ayling KC noted the woman admitted she thinks Mr Ward is “attractive” and “does not deny that what happened in the first car was consensual”.

The prosecution’s case was that Me Ward was “bent that night on having sex with her come what may” and suggested she had no motivation to say she was raped if it had not happened.

Her friends broke down in tears in court as they recalled “her demeanour was off” when she got back into the car for their return journey home and she ordered an STI kit during the drive back.

The woman said she exchanged some friendly messages with Mr Ward following the incident because she “had not fully come to terms with what had actually happened to her”.

Mr Ward said he had wanted to see her again but their contact fizzled out and his busy schedule took over.

He said that he was “shocked” when he was arrested at the airport as he returned from Italy, adding: “I knew that I had not done anything wrong and wanted to get the bottom of it.”

Defence counsel Sallie Bennett-Jenkins KC told the jury: “The woman has bluntly not been consistent and has told a series of lies that go to the heart of this matter.

“She has told them to the police and she has told them to you.”

It took 18 months from her original interview with police before the woman reported having deleted parts of messages with Ward, and it came to light as investigators asked her friends for screenshots of their chats, the court heard.

The woman said she had blood on her clothing, but tests found nothing and she “flipped one way and then the other” about whether there had been flirting, the KC said.

Ms Bennett-Jenkins told the jury: “There are three, at the very least, significant areas where the woman can be demonstrated not to have told the truth. Is that a witness upon who you can rely? I suggest not.”