This time around, the proposition may be rather simpler. Instead of taking on W&G’s IT, Clydesdale might simply take on the branches, close the customers’ RBS accounts and move them to Clydesdale ones.
It’s a simpler prospect, but though it does get around the RBS IT issue, it still poses risks of whoopsies along the way.
Will punters be able to keep the same account details? Will Clydesdale be able to offer the full service of business banking which RBS offers? Will such a move pacify the European regulators insisting on the disposal?
Furthermore, unlike Lloyds’ carve-out of TSB, where many of the punters affected were TSB customers originally anyway, I doubt whether many of the 1.8 million RBS customers affected have ever even heard of Clydesdale.
Unless, that is, they remember how it was forced to pay a £21 million fine last year for ripping off PPI mis-selling victims and deliberately doctoring their records.
If I were them, I’d be praying Santander, tempted by the new idea of sloughing off the old IT platform, might come back again.