“It is disappointing that, despite the Judge finding that Ms Staveley was a tough, persistent, clever and able negotiator, that he found ultimately that she could not have completed the deal which she had put in place and hence no loss was suffered. This is a surprising outcome.”
Lawyers representing bank bosses criticised Ms Staveley, who says PCP introduced Manchester City owner Sheikh Mansour - a member of the royal family of Abu Dhabi - to Barclays as an investor, during the trial.
Jeffery Onions QC, who led Barclays' legal team, told Mr Justice Waksman that she had a "tendency to exaggerate" when giving evidence. He said her evidence had been "peppered with hyperbole" and in some respects was "plainly dishonest".
Mr Justice Waksman described Ms Staveley as "the driving force of PCP" and as a "tough, clever and creative entrepreneur".
"Barclays contends that, in general, Ms Staveley was thoroughly unreliable, her evidence was inconsistent with documents, she had a flawed recollection and she was guilty of 'obvious embellishment and invention'," said the judge.
He accepted Barclays’ submission that Ms Staveley had a “tendency to exaggerate” when giving evidence, but concluded it did not affect the truthfulness of her evidence.
He added: "I thought that, for the most part, her evidence was reliable."
He said PCP had succeeded on liability but failed on causation and loss. The judge said the result was that the overall claim failed.
He added: "I can understand why this outcome will be a serious disappointment to PCP, especially after I have found Barclays to be guilty of serious deceit towards it."