The commonplace objections to Atkins are, first, on medical grounds: that the increased metabolic rate occasioned by an imbalance of protein may have long-term consequences for the circulatory system. And, secondly, on pecuniary grounds: Atkins's detractors argue that the maintenance of this diet (and its numerous derivatives) depends on a disposable income sufficient to afford truckloads of protein. Atkins does not thus address the demographic constituency which most suffers obesity, Cs and Ds on low incomes, who are obliged to subsist on processed foodstuffs and who are, further, ignorantly unapprised of the benefits of the cheaper cuts of meat. The industrialisation of the food chain in the Britain has, hygienically as well as gastronomically, much to answer for. There no longer exists in this country (or the US) the remotest equivalent of cucina povera or peasant cooking, which is characterised by sane resourcefulness. So the indigent will get fatter and the affluent will get faddier - and keep Atkins's heirs in business.