"We suspect that the explanation involves UV's contribution to vitamin D synthesis in the skin. However, in the current time, there are much safer and more reliable sources of vitamin D that do not come with carcinogenic risk, so there is real health value in avoiding sunlight as a source of vitamin D."
British experts urged caution when extrapolating the results of the research to humans.
Dr Clare Stanford, reader in experimental psychopharmacology at University College London, said: "This study does not provide the sort of evidence needed to show addiction to UV light in mice and it is even less certain that the work predicts addiction in humans.
"This would require testing whether the mice preferred UV light or non-UV light, which was not done in this paper.
"The strain of mice used in this experiment produce virtually no melatonin, which is thought to protect against damage from UV light. Shaving such mice and exposing them to UV light raises important ethical questions about animal welfare and again casts doubt on the relevance of the results to humans."
Dr Richard Weller, senior lecturer in dermatology at the University of Edinburgh, said: "Mice are nocturnal animals, covered in fur, which avoid the light, so one must be cautious about extrapolating from these experiments to man.
"Nonetheless, the authors discuss some literature suggesting that a similar pathway might also be present in man.
"It is very unlikely that evolutionary pressures would select for a trait which reduces survival and reproductive 'fitness'. If an 'addiction' to sun truly also exists in mankind, it suggests to me that there is a benefit to it.
"The authors mention vitamin D, but in addition to this, epidemiological data (particularly from Scandinavia) show that increased sun exposure is associated with reduced all-cause mortality.
"Our recent work shows how sunlight reduces blood pressure independently of vitamin D, which may account for some of the health enhancing effects of sun."