Bate, however, published an article in The Guardian a week later saying he would press ahead, but that the book would now perforce be less about the development of Hughes’s poetic voice after all. “With quotation now limited to fair dealing most of this will have to go, and the new version will be much more biographical,” he said, ominously. “I am disappointed at losing so much of Hughes’s wonderful written voice, but it is actually proving good writerly discipline to weave his thoughts in with my own words and not to fall back on big blocks of quotation. And I no longer have to worry about that rather artificial distinction between ‘biography’ and ‘literary life’.” So that was telling them, and now here’s the punitive result, published by Murdoch.
Weaving Hughes’s thoughts, about occultism, the Goddess and astrology for example, with his own remains a problem for Bate throughout, in that it forces him to present them, however idiotic, as though he takes them seriously, even believes them, himself — “nor were his planetary alignments encouraging”, etc — despite Bate being a clever and rational man (he got a top First at Cambridge, where Hughes took a Third).