In a bombshell ruling, a US judge has agreed that, in the case of HSBC, the American public has a First Amendment right to see what its monitors are saying.
Now, even if you’re sceptical of out-of-court settlements, this sudden U-turn simply can’t be fair. HSBC paid $1.9 billion to the US, thinking it had done a deal. The judiciary shouldn’t then be able to rip up a substantial part of their end.
Can HSBC now renege on its side, too, and demand its money back or kick out its monitors? Of course not.
Other corporations looking to strike deals with the US justice system beware. It can’t be trusted.