In her campaign to become Labour’s mayoral candidate, Tessa Jowell proposed a 1% levy on hotel stays — a familiar extra for regular visitors to many American cities. She earmarked the £50 million raised for cultural activities for the capital’s less well-off children plus the New Year’s Eve fireworks.
Her plan may still become a reality. The London Finance Commission, revived by Mayor Sadiq Khan to make the case for the devolution of fiscal powers to City Hall, recommends in its interim report access to a range of “locally specific levies” that could in future include “a small levy on visitors to support culture and tourism”.
What is often the sticking point for new taxes is how to justify them. Remember air passenger duty was first talked of as a “green” tax. Now that cash simply sloshes into the Treasury along with all the rest. However, London has shown that hypothecation works, such as the small rise in business rates to help fund Crossrail.
Taxing overnight stays is probably the easiest way. Even Airbnb has fallen into line to collect this levy in several cities. There are other options: with Arts Council grants under such pressure, why not charge overseas visitors for museum entry? It is not an idea that will find favour at institutions such as the British Museum, but many London tourists expect to pay anyway.
A 10-year London tourism strategy was due to be published by the capital’s promotional agency London & Partners last September but was delayed by Brexit and the departure of chief executive Gordon Innes. Let’s hope what eventually emerges is a bold vision that generates dividends for this city.
So much has been heard about the price worth paying for continued access to the single market — and, of course, it is imperative that London remains open for business. But where tourism is concerned, now is the time to debate what constitutes an appropriate entry fee.